- Timestamp:
- 2015-06-12T10:22:51-07:00 (9 years ago)
- File:
-
- 1 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
branches/f4grobner/division.lisp
r1432 r1433 200 200 (values p r c division-count)) 201 201 202 ;; Merge it someday with POLY-PSEUDO-DIVIDE. 203 ;; 204 ;; TODO: It is hard to test normal form as there is no 205 ;; loop invariant, like for POLY-PSEUDO-DIVIDE. 206 ;; Is there a testing strategy? 202 ;; 203 ;; Merge NORMAL-FORM someday with POLY-PSEUDO-DIVIDE. 204 ;; 205 ;; TODO: It is hard to test normal form as there is no loop invariant, 206 ;; like for POLY-PSEUDO-DIVIDE. Is there a testing strategy? One 207 ;; method would be to test NORMAL-FORM using POLY-PSEUDO-DIVIDE. 207 208 ;; 208 209 (defun normal-form (ring-and-order f fl
Note:
See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.